The Literature of Sentiment and Sensibility
I)
Definitions
a) in literary history between neo-classical Reason and romantic Imagination: the cultivation of Feeing – for its own sake, or with a moral purpose a transitional period?
cf. Northrop Frye: ‘Towards
Defining an Age of Sensibility’ – NOT pre-romanticism! – attempt to understand
the age of sensibility on its own terms Aritotelean and Longinian approaches to
literature:
1) Emphasis on product
– qualities of consciousness take the lead (metre, clarity, epigram, wit…) –
concentration of sense – characteristic of Augustan writing, but also of
Romanticism, according to Frye
2) ‘Where the emphasis is on the original process, the qualities of subconscious
association take the lead, and poetry becomes hypnotically repetitive,
oracular, incantatory, dreamlike and in the original sense of the word
charming.’ (Frye) – diffusion of sense – characteristic of the age of
sensibility
b)
in philosophy concept of sympathy as the basis of sociability –elaborated by philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment:
David Hume (1711-1776), A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40); Essays Moral and Political (1741-42); Adam Smith (1723-1790), The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)
Sources of the idea of sensibility:
-
benevolism of Shaftesbury, certain dissenting traditions (devotional poetry,
language of the heart, later in the works of Wesley e.g.)
-
philosophy of Locke (focus on sensory
perception)
-
in late 17th-c science (certain models of the nervous
system – sensibility as organisation (e.g. highly refined nervous organization)—feeling is not localised,
the whole body is the conduit of feeling!)
c)
in culture at large
cf. Susan Manning’s definition of
sensibility as ‘a system of relations and ruptures, part
of a fluctuating but continuous repertoire in emotional representation’ – permeates
a range of discourses, from abolitionism to discussions of sexuality
Definitions of terms:
According to Van Sant, ‘sensibility and sentimental are in one respect
easy to separate: sensibility is
associated with the body, sentiment with the mind. The first is based on
physical sensitivity and the processes of sensation; the second refers to a
refinement of thought’ (1993: 4).
BUT: Other scholars contend that the terms are so closely allied that 18th-c
writers often use them interchangeably!
II)
Characteristics and preoccupations
1) Mood of melancholy
(feeling ‘without object’! – cf. also introjections of
the sublime)
e.g.. William
Cowper (1731-1800): ‘The Castaway’ (1799)
2) Set-piece scenes
of virtue in distress – sympathetic
gazing upon a sufferer (a woman, a child, a slave, a bird, or other a small
animal)
cf. Sterne: A
Sentimental Journey Through
but also increasingly: the poet, the writer as
man/woman of feeling! – idea of the suffering artist
A
new concept of masculinity: feminine virtue is bestowed upon men (feminization
of men?) – men represented as susceptible to all kinds of emotions and
emotional excess – re-definition of
gentility as a non-aristocratic virtue!! (cf. rise of middle-classes)
3)
bodily expression of feeling (cf. nervous theory) -- somatized reactions (tears, swoons, deathly
pallor)
cf. Henry
Mackenzie’s The Man of Feeling (1771)
4)
trope of personification
in poetry
cf. Collins's ‘The Passions: An Ode for Music’, ‘Ode
to Fear’
5)
Stylistic excess
creating a performance of intimacy (ellipses,
fragmentation, exclamations, etc.) – making sure that the feeling can be
experienced as sincere (cf. negative connotations of ‘sentimental’)
e.g. Richardson’s Pamela,
or Virtue Rewarded (1740); Clarissa,
or the History of a Young Lady (1747-48); Sir Charles Grandison (1753-54)
focus on private subjectivity; epistolary form depicts
the inmost feelings of characters in the passing moments of their formation
(‘writing to the moment’), and enables recording the impact on others, whose
tearful responses provided the example for the reader’s reaction (‘reading for
the sentiment’);
6)
Expression over correctness
and rules – revolution in poetic language!
e.g. Chatterton's Rowley poems
III)
Some issues in connection with the literature of
sensibility
1)
Objectifying
the sufferer – ‘theatrics of virtue’ (latent sadism?)
hierarchical setting: pity for
children, women, animals, the uneducated, etc.
bestows on the gazer a special
value
BUT: an increasing number of
women poets, ‘rustic’ poets, and even slaves write literature!
cf. the case of Robert Burns:
a Scottish peasant poet (called a ‘heaven-taught ploughman’ by Mackenzie) who
invites sympathy, but also wants to dictate the terms in which he can be
sympathised with
2)
Exercise
of compassion, instead of social action? -- but often promoting social
reform
3) Questions of sincerity and
manipulation
cf. Burns: ‘O Leave Novels’ Thanks
No comments: